In my family, both immediate and more broadly, I have the
reputation as the one to whom family items can be entrusted. Relatives near (my parents, uncles, aunts) and
more distant (a half-second-cousin once removed, for example) have given me
family artefacts, papers, books and other objects over the years. I’ve been
fortunate to obtain objects from all four branches of my family. (See my post Getting Started and Getting
Organized for more information on how I segment my family research into four
|RMS Carpathia in New York |
after rescuing survivors of the Titanic disaster
From my Woodruff side, I have inherited a large collection
of china that came (I had thought) from the family of my dad’s father. I didn’t believe there was much handed down
from my dad’s mother and assumed the china was all from my grandfather. Although my grandmother was born into a
wealthy Canadian family, her family lost everything in the 1929 stock market
crash when she was 16 years old. The
following year, she moved to the States and started out on her own in New York
City (see my post The Life of an Aspiring Actress – New York in the 1930s). I always believed that she didn’t bring anything
from her family, as they weren’t in a position to keep much. Her mother went from living in a mansion with
servants to living with strangers, her husband having abandoned her after
losing the fortune, in boarding houses, so I knew that it was unlikely she
would have had any fine china to give her daughter. I proved to be wrong about this assumption when
I researched my Woodruff china and found a possible connection to my
grandmother’s family and the Carpathia, the famous ship that rescued survivors
of the Titanic.
A small set of the Woodruff china is a lidded tureen with
matching cups, perhaps for coffee. It is
an odd combination, but I always assumed they were all that was left of a
One day I was assessing the china for insurance purposes, so
when I came across the tureen and cups I gave them more scrutiny than I had in the
past. Oddly, the cups had no markings at
all on them – they’re fine bone china, so I found it odd that there was no
maker’s mark. The tureen, on
examination, did have a mark and it was one that I found fascinating. It was marked “Nippon” and “The
A quick look online confirmed my assumption that “Nippon”
was not a manufacturer but an indication that it was manufactured in Japan. Porcelain exported from Japan between 1891 and
1921 was marked with “Nippon” after which the marking was changed to “Japan.” As
to the other marking, if memory served me correctly, the Carpathia was a ship
that came to the rescue of survivors of the Titanic.
The Carpathia was, indeed, the first ship to reach the
Titanic after the disaster. A Cunard
line ship, in April 1912 the Carpathia took on 705 of the Titanic’s survivors,
earning its place in history. The ship
entered into service in 1903 and alternated between Atlantic crossings and
Mediterranean service. The Carpathia was
sunk by German torpedoes in 1918 during World War I.
So, how does this tureen with the Carpathia markings relate
to the ship? My first step was to do an
Internet search on the markings. Indeed,
I found other tureens and china pieces with the same markings and much
speculation as to the origins. I found
no definitive answer as to the origins of the mark, but the speculation is that
the pieces were, indeed, service items from the Carpathia. Because it was all produced en masse for the
ship, it was probably not marked with anything other than the ship’s name.
The cups, with their matching design, didn’t bear the ship’s
name, so it’s possible that they were made in greater numbers for use across
multiple Cunard line ships. One would
assume that they would have borne the Cunard name, but because the cup pattern
matches the tureen patter, the cups clearly have some connection to the
My guess is that the tureen was sold as a Carpathia-specific
souvenir in their gift shop and they also sold the more generic cups as
well. Operating under this assumption,
that the pieces were purchased as travel souvenirs, I still didn’t know who
bought the set. Was it one of my
ancestors making a crossing? Or was it a
gift from someone else who had sailed on the Carpathia, later given to my
ancestor? These are clearly not the only
two possibilities, but they struck me as the most probable.
Having established this strong speculative connection with
the Carpathia, I then had to determine if any family members had sailed on the
ship. If an ancestor sailed on the
Carpathia, the circumstantial connection would be much greater. I had to identify which ancestors would have
potentially sailed during that time period.
In the period from 1903 to 1918, there were any number of them
who could have sailed on the Carpathia, so I made a list and started searching! During this 15 year time frame (1903 to
1918), my ancestors on the Woodruff side sorted themselves out as follows:
- One couple was a wealthy real estate developer
and his wife, Frederick Orr Woodruff and Fannie (Sturtevant) Woodruff, who
lived in Boston. I have documentation that they had been to Europe in 1901, so
perhaps they went again?
- There was also my great-great grandmother, Maria
(Pennell) Hoyt living in Ogunquit, Maine. She was a wealthy widow whose
industrialist husband, CC Hoyt, had died in 1904 (he or they could have sailed,
too, prior to his death during its first year in service, 1903).
- Another great-great grandmother, Mary (Ellis)
Bunting, was in Toronto, also a wealthy widow.
- Finally, there was one great-great grandfather, Arthur
Lapthorn Smith, a widower, who retired from Montréal to London during that period. Did he sail on the Carpathia?
Both sets of great-grandparents would also have been
prospects. They were mostly in their
late teens (one was 22) in 1903 and both couples married during the period that
the Carpathia sailed. One couple
divorced during that time period as well, both re-marrying. Could any of these couples have gone to
Europe for their honeymoon?
I realized that it could not have been either of my
grandparents on that side – they were 5 and 10 years old at the time of the
Carpathia’s sinking. Even if they had
sailed on the Carpathia, it would have been an older relative making the
decision to purchase the china.
This left me with nine ancestors to research (ten if I included my
great-great-grandfather, CC Hoyt, who died a year after the Carpathia entered
service, but I saw him as a distant possibility). It could have been any of them, although I
assumed it would be the elder, more settled generation. They all had ties in England and further
afield in Europe and they were all of a class that could afford to sail in
style on the Cunard line and purchase china as a souvenir of their voyage. The ocean liners were the only way to travel
to Europe, so the crossing was a common mode of transportation for anyone with
business or family on the other side of the Atlantic.
I started the search process on four sites: Ancestry,
Google, Family Search and American Ancestors.
I went down the list, name by name on each of the sites to see if I
could make any connection. I researched
each of them individually, searching each name, the Carpathia, and the date
range of Carpathia’s service. Then, after
getting a good way through my list of names (and, incidentally, finding no match
in the elder generation), I found a possible connection!
On 14 September, 1905, “Alleen Smith” disembarked from the
Carpathia in New York. She was listed as
a single female and, disconcertingly, as a US citizen. I have a Canadian great-grandmother who would
have been several months shy of her 19th birthday in September
1905. Her full name was Alexandra
Victoria Aileen Smith, but she went by Aileen.
On examination, I determined that the passenger manifest was
a list of passengers compiled by the crew of the ship and provided to the US
officials on arrival at New York. The
page on which Alleen appears lists US citizens traveling in First Class or
Saloon Class (one step below First).
This is not an official border crossing document, but rather a list of
people for the border agents to use as a cross reference.
Aileen was a wealthy young Canadian socialite with cousins
in England, Scotland and even one Canadian cousin who had married a Florentine
count. An 18 year old Canadian of that
class coming back from a grand tour of Europe after coming of age would easily
have acted, sounded and appeared exactly like a young New York socialite of the
time. If Aileen made such a trip, a purser
could easily have mistaken her for a US citizen and made an error on a
passenger manifest entry. Clearly I am operating under the assumption that “Alleen”
was a misspelling of “Aileen.”
Aileen was born in 1886, a year in which her name was not
terribly common (“Eileen” was three times more popular). The name “Alleen” was even less common. Babies named Aileen that year were more than double
those named Alleen. Aileen was not a
name that one would come across every day in a ship’s manifest of passengers,
and Alleen would been more of a surprise.
The toughest part of confirming that this is my great-grandmother here
is, of course, her surname, Smith, which would appear numerous times on every
|Sidney Bunting and Aileen Smith on their wedding day,|
October 6, 1910, 5 years after
her name seems to appear on the Carpathia manifest
I have access to parcels of letters she wrote to her fiancé
(my great-grandfather) a few years later – perhaps in one of those letters she
mentions a trip to Europe. We shall see
when I have the time to read through them.
In the meantime, I’m happy to believe that there’s a good possibility
that the woman on the Carpathia manifest is my great-grandmother and that she
purchased the Carpathia tureen and the matching cups as a souvenir of her grand
tour of Europe at the age of 18.
That Alleen Smith is on the manifest that includes first
class passengers matches her lifestyle at the time (sadly wiped out completely
by the Crash of 1929). The closeness of the spelling of her name isn’t a worry
for me. All of this speculation is made
easier because I have the tureen, no other family connection to the Carpathia
and the circumstances match her family circumstances. I’m happy to draw all these conclusions until
I can gain further information.
First, the ship manifest resources available on-line are
significant. I have records of other
family members’ crossings as a result of these databases, which helps to
increase my knowledge of their lives, thereby increasing my knowledge of them.
Second, it’s OK to guess at connections such as this. I am not making a genealogical assumption,
nor am I drawing any conclusions in this other than a possible trip taken by an
ancestor that would explain a bowl I inherited.
I am being careful to not state as fact anything that is not. In this instance, though, I feel comfortable
drawing more tenuous conclusions than I would were this a question of lineage
Finally, you never know where a quick insurance assessment
document will take you. I don’t recall
ever looking at the tureen’s markings before.
In making up an insurance inventory I was thrown into a much bigger
family history research project. What a
great result from a mundane task!
York, Passenger Lists, 18201957 [database online]. Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
information for 1886:
Post a Comment